"They could be made to accept the most flagrant violations of reality, and were not sufficiently interested in public events to notice what was happening"
- George Orwell - 1984

Saturday, November 3, 2007

Murder of Two Whites in Nashville

And the national media is silent, again. Typical hush crime you’ll NEVER hear about on CNN, Fox, MSNBC, ect. Two blacks, one a female, rob and murder, execution style, two whites. Watch the video HERE and see how the jewish media seeks to mitigate what this female savage did, i.e. 'she was nice,' 'She was quiet,' 'I’m SHOCKED that she was involved,' ect.

'Classmates Describe Suspect In Bellacino’s Slayings As Quiet, Nice' The jewish media always does this. It’s known as media mitigation and whenever a black person murders a white it’s the first thing the media does in an effort to soothe the unhappiness of whites that are beginning to conclude the obvious, blacks are out of control and need to be controlled in one way or another.

Candlelight Vigil For Slain Teenager

A judge postponed the court hearing Friday of two people police believe were responsible killing two Bellacino’s Pizza employees.Jason Bobo, a former employee and Crystle Rutherford were charged with fatally shooting Chris Caris and Joshua Cole at the West Nashville business.

Cole’s relatives and friends gathered outside the business a week after the shootings.

They placed flowers, letters and candles o the pavement to honor the 18-year-old who worked there to earn extra money.

A family’s vigil was the only chance to speak out about the crime because their chance was taken away earlier in the day in court.

“It enrages me that my family is going to have to wait another 30 days to start this process,” his mother Tina Cole.

The first court hearing was pushed back.

“When she walked in that room at Bellacino’s with a gun in her hand and had it on my son while he lay there helplessly,” Cole said.

The crime was caught on tape. It still leaves many questions. Cole’s family is disappointed about another delay in their quest to find answers.

Cole’s family questions whether the crime was a robbery attempted, as police called it.

“My son had money in his wallet,” Cole said. I do not see that as a robbery. We went and picked up his belongings. He had $208 in his wallet that was never touched

One relative said he thought it was a hate crime.

“Our nights have been sleepless, wondering how these people can go and do what they’re doing,” Cole said.

Bobo told police he targeted the business for robbery because he knew the layout.

Police said Rutherford also confessed. Her father said Bobo forced her to participate.

Both will be in court at the end of the month.

Police said Bobo told them he killed Caris because the pair worked together and he feared Caris would be able to identify him to police.
Story Here

Murder Suspects Jason Bobo and Crystle Rutherford

Thursday, November 1, 2007

The Century of Self

"This series is about how those in power have used Freud's theories to try and control the dangerous crowd in an age of mass democracy." -Adam Curtis (Narrator)

Part One

Part Two

Part Three

Part Four

NYC Declares Day Against Hate Crimes

Proclaiming New York "a city of tolerance," the City Council speaker declared a day against hate to counter a spate of bias crimes, including the discoveries of a swastika and a noose on the doors of two university professors.

"We're here as religious leaders, as community leaders, as government leaders to send a message: that we will not tolerate hate of any kind in our city," the speaker, Christine Quinn, said at a news conference Thursday.

Joined by New York's borough presidents, City Council members and civic leaders, she announced that Nov. 29 will be the city's "Day Out Against Hate."

The day is to begin with an interfaith prayer breakfast and feature encounters between Holocaust survivors and teenagers and discussions involving senior citizen centers, schools and youth programs.

Some activities will include the Columbia University campus, where a Jewish professor discovered a swastika painted on her office door on Wednesday. Last month, a black professor at Columbia's graduate school of education found a noose on her office door.

Several other nooses have recently popped up around the city, racist graffiti has been found in two public high schools, and synagogues and homes have been defaced with swastikas. A black high school principal in Brooklyn received a letter that read, "White Power Forever," and a noose was discovered outside a post office near ground zero.
Story Here

Reining - A Near Perfect Slide Stop

Gorgeous animal! His name is Jacs Wonder Who, a World Champion reiner at 2 years old. Our horse Rebel was a Champion reiner in his younger years (not a World Champ though :P)and I really love the athletic ability of these Quarter Horses.

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Zimbabwe's millionaires worth only $1

And the cost of a coke is nearly $27,000.

Zimbabwe’s currency has fallen to record levels, with one million Zimbabwean dollars buying a single US dollar (48p) and inflation reaching 8,000 per cent.

The bleak data was announced as people in the capital Harare struggled to cope without electricity for the third day. “We closed our business today,” said a woman who helps to run a major petrol supplier. “We just can’t operate like this.”

The National Blood Transfusion Services said that it had been unable to test blood since Tuesday. “We are in serious trouble,” said a doctor.

At independence in 1980, the Zimbabwean dollar held parity with the US dollar but the currency has suffered from the recent economic policies of President Mugabe; at the beginning of this year it was $Z2,800 to one US dollar and ten days ago $Z500,000.

President Mugabe has struggled to keep inflation under control and in July ordered businesses to halve their prices to alleviate the country’s woes. The order resulted in the arrest of about 10,000 business people as thousands of police officers raided companies, shopping malls and markets to take goods marked above price control levels. Now the supermarkets are bare and it is almost impossible to buy food.

Although the inflation rate slowed marginally in August it rose to 7,982 last month, according to official statistics, which are regarded as highly conservative. “It shows the lunacy of their belief they can legislate against inflation and bring it down at the barrel of a gun,” said Rob Davies, an economist.

Officials in Mr Mugabe’s ruling party reportedly expect him to sign a law that will force all foreign-owned companies, including local subsidiaries of Barclays and Standard Chartered, to sell 51 per cent of their equity to black Zimbabweans.
Story Here

My Celebrity Look-a-Likes

Me and Stephanie were playing around with some look-a-like software. She's devasted because one of her matches was Brad Pitt! LOL... 'If Brad were a girl, he'd be a pretty girl', I tried to tell her. We consoled ourselves with mini snickers bars. It's Halloween afterall. :P

University to Students: All Whites are Racist

Mandatory program 'treats' politically incorrect attitudes.

A mandatory University of Delaware program requires residence hall students to acknowledge that "all whites are racist" and offers them "treatment" for any incorrect attitudes regarding class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality they might hold upon entering the school, according to a civil rights group.

"Somehow, the University of Delaware seems terrifyingly unaware that a state-sponsored institution of higher education in the United States does not have the legal right to engage in a program of systematic thought reform. The First Amendment protects the right to freedom of conscience – the right to keep our innermost thoughts free from governmental intrusion. It also protects the right to be free from compelled speech," said a letter from Samantha Harris, director of legal and public advocacy for The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education to university President Patrick Harker.

The organization cited excerpts from the university's Office of Residence Life Diversity Education Training documents, including the statement:

"A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. 'The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities, or acts of discrimination….'"

The education program also notes that "reverse racism" is "a term created and used by white people to deny their white privilege." And "a non-racist" is called "a non-term," because, the program explains, "The term was created by whites to deny responsibility for systemic racism, to maintain an aura of innocence in the face of racial oppression, and to shift the responsibility for that oppression from whites to people of color (called 'blaming the victim')."

The "education" regarding racism is just one of the subjects that students are required to adopt as part of their University of Delaware experience, too, FIRE noted.

The "shocking program of ideological reeducation," which the school itself defines as a "treatment" for students' incorrect attitudes and beliefs, is nothing less than "Orwellian," FIRE said.

The school requires its approximately 7,000 residence hall students "to adopt highly specific university-approved views on issues ranging from politics to race, sexuality, sociology, moral philosophy and environmentalism."

"FIRE is calling for the total dismantling of the program, which is a flagrant violation of students' rights to freedom of conscience and freedom from compelled speech," the organization said.

On a foundation blog, a student noted that one residence assistant told students, "Not to scare anyone or anything, but these are MANDATORY!!" And the training program for those who indoctrinate students includes the order: "A researcher must document that the treatment/intervention was faithfully applied (ex: specific lesson plans were delivered to every student, etc.)."

Further, the school requires "a systemic change" as a result of the program, FIRE noted. As one RA told students: "Like it or not, you all are the future Leaders, and the world is Diverse, so learning to Embrace and Appreciate that diversity is ESSENTIAL."

"The University of Delaware's residence life education program is a grave intrusion into students' private beliefs," FIRE President Greg Lukianoff said. "The university has decided that it is not enough to expose its students to the values it considers important; instead, it must coerce its students into accepting those values as their own. At a public university like Delaware, this is both unconscionable and unconstitutional."

According to university materials, RAs are instructed to ask students during one-on-one sessions questions such as: "When did you discover your sexual identity?" "When were you first made aware of your race?" and "Who taught you a lesson in regard to some sort of diversity awarness? What was the lesson?"

"Students who express discomfort with this type of questioning often meet with disapproval from their RAs, who write reports on these one-on-one sessions and deliver these reports to their superiors. One student identified in a write-up as an RA's 'worst' one-on-one session was a young woman who stated that she was tired of having 'diversity shoved down her throat,'" FIRE said.

This particular student responded to the question, "When did you discover your sexual identity?" with the terse: "That is none of your damn business," FIRE said.

Requirements for students include: "Students will recognize that systemic oppression exists in our society," "Students will recognize the benefits of dismantling systems of oppression," and "Students will be able to utilize their knowledge of sustainability to change their daily habits and consumer mentality," FIRE said.

The foundation said students even are "pressured or even required" to make social statements that meet with the school's approval.

"The fact that the university views its students as patients in need of treatment for some sort of moral sickness betrays a total lack of respect not only for students' basic rights, but for students themselves," Lukianoff said. "The University of Delaware has both a legal and a moral obligation to immediately dismantle this program, and FIRE will not rest until it has."

A spokesman for the school, contacted by WND, said he was not ready to make a statement about the situation right away.

But the foundation's letter to Harker noted, "we have never encountered a more systematic assault upon the individual liberty, dignity, privacy, and autonomy of university students than this program," which "requires students to adopt highly specific university-approved views on issues."

"Such utter contempt for the autonomy and free agency of others is the hallmark of totalitarianism and has no place in any free society, let alone at a public university in the state of Delaware," the letter said.

Especially alarming, Harris told WND, is that the school defines learning specifically as "attitudinal or behavioral changes," not acquiring any sort of knowledge and ability.

Such thinking "represents a distorted idea of 'education' that one would more easily associate with a Soviet prison camp than with an American institution of higher education," FIRE said. "As another example, after an investigation showed that males demonstrated 'a higher degree of resistance to educational efforts,' the Rodney complex chose to hire 'strong male RAs.' Each such RA 'combats male residents' concepts of traditional male identity,' in order to 'ensure the delivery of the curriculum at the same level as in the female floors.' This language is disturbingly reminiscent of a pivotal scene from George Orwell's '1984,' in which the protagonist's captors tell him that 'The Party is not interested in the overt act: the thought is all we care about. We do not merely destroy our enemies, we change them.'"

No small danger, FIRE noted, is being presented to the university through such apparent constitutional violations. "Simply put, the residence life education program is a legal minefield," the group said.

One student reacted to the indoctrination with rebellion. On the FIRE blog, he wrote:

"Take the issue of homosexuality, and the rights that should or should not be associated with it. As a Christian, I believe that the Bible says homosexuality is wrong, and is a sin against God. As such, I cannot accept it as a legitimate lifestyle. While I accept homosexuals as people, I do not accept their choice as right, and subsequently I do not think that homosexual couples should be given marital rights. I accept that others do not hold the same views as me. But it is wrong that under the Residence Life curriculum and school mandated curriculum that I should made to feel guilty for my views. … It is not the school's right to try to convince me to embrace the values that Residence Life has chosen. Essentially, if I do not change my views, I will be labeled by my RA as not embracing diversity, and not accepting of certain groups, and thus my RA will try all the harder to change me. This is not the school's job, or right."
Story Here

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Happy Halloween!

Baked some cookies and banana bread this afternoon for the Halloween party tomorrow. Should be a good time, with lots of little kids on their sugar highs!

Defensive Frog

Budgett frogs look like they're from another planet!

The round squat body jiggles like a bag of water when the frog moves, and the eyes sit atop the head like a pair of tiny ping pong balls.

When this frog is frightened it opens its huge mouth, screams like a cat in pain and lunges toward an aggressor. With two large tooth-like projections, the frog is known to bite and is capable of drawing blood.

Regardless, they'd still eat him up in China!

Monday, October 29, 2007

FreeTalk Live Sunday Broadcast

Please download, and pass along this most awesome broadcast of FTL Sunday (Originally aired October 28, 2007)

Hosted by Mark Faust, with Mishko Novosel.

Listen Here:White Education 101

Jewish Media Control: All about the companies and Jews who own and control the world's media.

Government Facts and Numbers: How many Jews are in congress? How many Blacks? How many Mestizos? Who is who's adviser? Who owns what? Who are the top ten shareholders of the Federal Reserve??

Crime By Race Stats: Straight from the ZOG's very own FBI web site. Always a great way to shut up those poisoned lemmings.

Illegal Alien Stats: Back by popular demand! We will take a look into how many American Lives are lost due to our filthy Southern invaders, How many of our women and children are raped, and of course how much money it costs all of us to play host to these scumbags.

Racist Hoaxes Against Whites, NON WHITES BUSTED!: We will take a look into how Jews, Blacks, and other non-Whites are blaming us for their bad behavior by painting reversed swastikas and other such failed tactics.

This show was so good, and so informative that it put Rabbi Preciousmetalstein back into the hospital.

Rabbi Preciousmetalstein back in hospital

Oct. 28, 2004
Saul Slopberg - AP

Doctors say it's a relapse

New York City's leading Rabbi has been stricken with an acute attack of impacted bowels once again. Rabbi Phlegm Preciousmetalstein was taken to Mt. Sinai Hospital on 5th Ave at 7:30 PM on Sunday. His wife said that a little bird told him that VNN's Free Talk Live was back on the air and suddenly the Rabbi clutched his lower gut, and yelled something unintelligible and then passed out on the kitchen floor. Mrs. Preciousmetalstein said that her husband was an Auschwitz Concentration camp survivor and that Hitler, himself, cut out the lower half of the Rabbi's intestine with a carpet knife, and since 1944 he's been prone to these attacks whenever he senses that there might be hateful Nazis on the radio.

Wii Golf.... the Funniest Game on the Planet

This is quite possibly, the cutest baby I have ever seen.

Pieces of Hate

From Leonard Feeney to Long John Sheeney

Written by Luke O'Farrell

To get to the point, let’s get to The Point. That’s the name of the newsletter edited by Father Leonard Feeney (1897-1978), a trouble-making American Catholic who wouldn’t stand by meekly as his church and his nation were readied for destruction. Way back in the 1950s, The Point addressed a very important topic:

Should Hate Be Outlawed?

Most Americans, hearing this question, would answer promptly, “Yes, by all means, hate should be outlawed!” Their eagerness to reply can be accounted for all too easily. During the last decade and a half, they have been pounded with a propaganda barrage calculated to leave them in a state of dazed affability toward the whole world. Those advertising techniques that are normally used to encourage Americans to be choosy in matters of soap and toothpaste are now being enlisted to persuade them that there is no such thing as a superior product in matters of culture and creed. On billboards, on bus and subway posters, in newspapers and magazines, through radio and television broadcasts, Americans are being assured and reassured, both subtly and boldly, that “Bigotry is fascism ... Only Brotherhood can save our nation ... We must be tolerant of all!”

“Only Brotherhood can save our nation”? Well, not quite: what the propagandists really meant was that only Big-Brotherhood could save America. What is hate? Hate is thought crime. The Point doesn’t refer to a novel published less than a decade before, but it’s addressing the same topic as George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1948). Between them the Catholic Feeney and the atheist Orwell produced an uncannily accurate prophecy of the totalitarian scientific future. Feeney didn’t, of course, believe in free speech as a general principle or recognize the importance of science and technology, but he had one huge advantage over Orwell. He was prepared to name the group behind the hate crusade and all the other slow, stealthy moves to turn Western nations into police states:

As surely and securely as the Jews have been behind Freemasonry, or Secularism, or Communism, they are behind the “anti-hate” drive. Not that this movement represents the fruition of Talmudic doctrine. The Jews are advocating tolerance only for its destructive value – destructive, that is, of the Catholic Church. On their part, they still keep alive their racial rancors and antipathies. Their Talmud, for example, still teaches that Christ was a brazen impostor, and gives an unprintably blasphemous account of his parentage and birth. And as the Christmas season just past should have taught us, the Jews, for all their Brotherhood talk, have not in the least abandoned their resolute program to make all acknowledgments of Christmas disappear from the public and social life of the nation.

The secret of the Jews’ success is, of course, that they can practice such private hate while promoting public “love”, and not be accused of inconsistency. For, as always, they are running the show mainly from behind the scenes. They get their message across by means of co-operative Gentiles. And there are probably more such Gentiles now available – both the willing kind and the kind willing to be duped – than ever before in history. As a further good fortune, the Jewish directors of America’s entertainment industry can now guarantee that one Brotherhood spokesman, well-placed (e.g., behind a microphone or before a television camera), is able to influence Americans by the millions. And the Jews’ campaign is succeeding. We have every reason to be alarmed at its success. American Catholics, even those not actively taking part in the tolerance talk, are now kept in line by the omnipresent threat of being accused of hate, bigotry, and intolerance.

That threat isn’t strong enough: Jewish groups like the Anti-Defamation League, under its director Abe “The Snake” Foxman, want not just accusations of hate but arrests and imprisonments for hate. Alas, the First Amendment is still getting in their way. If only the Founding Fathers hadn’t been so foolish as to arm the fallible people against the infallible state! In Britain, however, where there is no constitutional guarantee of free speech, Jewish groups like the Community Security Trust, under its director Mike “Gag the Goys” Whine, have been able to achieve their ideal. Arrests and imprisonments for inciting racial hatred have been taking place ever since the 1960s. And now, much to the dismay of many liberals, we have a new category of thought criminals: those guilty of inciting religious hatred.

But what started fairly slowly is picking up pace and right on the heels of the faith hate law came an announcement from Jack “The Jew” Straw, our hilariously named Minister for Justice, that an even newer category of thought criminal was on its way: those guilty of inciting hatred of homosexuals. Here’s the reaction of Johann Hari, a fat homosexual who is one of Britain’s leading liberals:

It’s always strange and sad when you have to disagree with people who have purely good motives and purely good goals. Over the past week, I have smacked into disagreement twice with friends and allies in the fight for equality for gay people. Both times, the rows have boiled down to one core question: should the people who hate and detest us just because of a trivial and irreversible biological fact – homosexuality – be subject to extra criminal sanctions? (The Independent, 11th October 2007)

Hari both rejects and misunderstands the law. If its motives and goals are “purely good”, then Hari himself will win Slimmer of the Year in 2008. The law is in fact another step in the slow-motion revolution being overseen by Britain’s New Labour party and its friends in the media, academia and state bureaucracy. Homosexuals are like women and non-whites: they were recruited for revolution when the white British working class failed to assist the triumph of communism. By inciting these groups to resentment and hatred of white male heterosexuals, the power-hungry crypto-communists of New Labour have been able to use them as shock-troops in a war that will end, they hope, in a police state under their control. It’s happening all across the West: a slow-motion revolution that is getting less slow and gaining more motion by the year.

The homo hate law is part of the war. Like the race hate laws, it’s designed both to reward a privileged minority and to reinforce its privilege in the eyes of the enemy. When Hari calls homosexuality a “trivial biological fact”, he’s actually blaspheming. Like being female or non-white, being homosexual is special. It places one in a privileged category, exalted above one’s heterosexual oppressors, just as females are exalted above their male oppressors and non-whites above their white ones. This is a translation of old communist doctrine based on the saintly proletariat, the oppressive bourgeoisie and the exploitative capitalist. And when you look at New Labour, guess what? There are “ex”-communists everywhere, from Peter Mandelson, one of New Labour’s chief ideologues, to David Aaronovitch, one of New Labour’s chief propagandists, to Trevor Phillips, one of New Labour’s chief ideological enforcers.

There are also Jews everywhere in New Labour, as you might guess from names like Mandelson and Aaronovitch. Tony Blair’s departure and Gordon Brown’s arrival have been a case of “Meet the new boss – same as the old boss.” But Brown isn’t the real boss any more than Blair was: he serves a particular ethnic minority that is always sure to keep its cold and calculating eye on government, making sure of everything and nothing: “Everything for Jews’ benefit, nothing for whites’ benefit.” You can often see this Jewish control mentioned in the mainstream media, though it isn’t described as such. Here’s the magazine Private Eye describing Brown’s “New Kind of Politics”:

Tony Blair, 1997: Appoints former personal adviser Peter Mandelson as cabinet office minister to be his eyes and ears across government.

Gordon Brown, 2007: Appoints former personal adviser Ed Miliband as cabinet office minister to be his eyes and ears across government.

Mandelson and Miliband are both Jews. What are the odds against members of such a small ethnic minority occupying the same central position under two different prime ministers? Ed Miliband has a brother called David, tipped himself as a future prime minister and presently serving as Foreign Secretary in succession to Jews like Jack Straw and Malcolm Rifkind. Again, what are the odds against that? It’s certainly not happening by chance, but it isn’t happening simply because of that much-vaunted Jewish intelligence. There is also a lust for power and control that augurs very ill for the goyim in a Jew-dominated nation: remember the early Soviet Union. And guess what again? The Milibands are sons of a Marxist refugee called Ralph Miliband. He raises another question. How often are anti-Semites mocked for their “contradictory” belief in Jews’ being behind both communism and capitalism?

Well, Ralph was one of those not-so-strange oxymorons: a Marxist millionaire. Maybe the money he left explains the smug smiles that flicker so often across his sons’ faces. Or maybe they’re just glad to be realizing Daddy’s Dream as they help turn Britain into a communist police state. And it isn’t just me who finds them both smug and sinister: step forward the journalist Rod Liddle, who, like John Prescott, appears to be one of those goys who are anti-Semitic without realizing it. He’s been abusing Peter Mandelson for years:

It has been a long-held view of mine that most of the evil in the world today can be traced back, somehow, to Peter Mandelson. People tell me that this is irrational and warped. And yet, as the Burmese soldiers sprayed those protesting monks with tear gas and bunged them in the back of paddy wagons to be taken God knows where and for God knows how long, the EU Trade Commissioner’s spectral form once again swam towards me from inside my television set. (The Spectator, 26th September 2007)

This is what he’s said about David Miliband in an article on the fallibility of DNA testing:

I’m no expert, but I would have thought that my own DNA would also provide at least an 80 per cent match with [the crime victim] Madeleine [McCann]’s, along with Vladimir Putin’s, [the NuLabourite] Ruth Kelly’s and indeed that of a polecat, honey badger or a fruit-fly. In fact, so far as I’m aware, there is almost nothing on this planet which doesn’t share 80 per cent of its DNA with Madeleine McCann; maybe some rocks, certain lichen, KFC chicken nuggets and David Miliband. (The Spectator, 12th September 2007)

There’s a racial antagonism at work there: the predatory alien nature of Jews is disturbing and repulsive to goys, who respond by characterizing them as evil, spectral and abhuman or by giving them sinister nicknames: Richard “Prince of Darkness” Perle in the US, for example, and Michael “Dracula” Howard (né Hecht) in the UK. I feel this repulsion when I look at pictures of Herbert Marcuse, the Jewish Freudo-Marxist who was hard at work when Mandelson, Aaronovitch and Phillips were starry-eyed student revolutionaries. There’s an excellent summary of Marcuse’ work in volume three of Leszek Kolakowski’s Main Currents of Marxism (1978). Kolakowski lived in communist Poland and had a deep insight into what lies at the heart of Marxism and other Jewish ideologies: the lust for power and control. Like the egomaniac Marx, like the egomaniac Trotsky, like all the smaller Jewish egomaniacs following in their wake, Marcuse wanted to create what is, for Jews, an earthly paradise: a police state of goyim under Jewish control.

But Marcuse faced a problem: establishing the paradisical police state would take a lot of work. There was false consciousness to smash, an existing society to transcend, the very structure of present reality to destroy:

But who is to do all this when a majority of the people, and especially of the working class, are absorbed by the system and are not interested in the “global transcendence” of the existing order? The answer, according to [Marcuse’] One-Dimensional Man, is that “underneath the conservative popular base is the substratum of the outcasts and the outsiders, the exploited and persecuted of other races and other subjects, the unemployed and unemployable. They exist outside the democratic process...” It appears, then, that lumpenprolitariat of the racial minorities of the United States is the section of humanity ordained above all others to restore the unity of Eros and Logos, to create the new qualitative science and technology, and to free mankind from the tyranny of formal logic, positivism, and empiricism. However, Marcuse elsewhere explains that we can also count on other forces, namely students and the peoples of economically and technically backward countries. The alliance of these three groups is the chief hope for the liberation of mankind. (Op. cit., “Herbert Marcuse: Marxism as a totalitarian Utopia”, pg. 411)

That is the wisdom absorbed by Britain’s modern rulers in their student days: recruit outsiders for revolution. Mass immigration from “economically and technically backward countries” into Britain has created one set of revolutionary warriors; homosexuals are another set. Both are now privileged with special laws over the counter-revolutionary white heterosexual majority, but there’s a big contradiction between mass immigration and “gay rights”. Johann Hari unwittingly revealed it when he spoke of how gentle gays are oppressed by hateful heteros:

This February a 28-year-old gay man called Robert Goddard got on the bus to East London after a long night working in a West End club. He was knackered and rested his head on his boyfriend’s shoulder when suddenly a group of five big, aggressive lads began to shout at them. “You fucking batty-boys! We’re going to smash your head with a brick. We’re going to follow you off the bus and kill you,” they declared. Rob called the police, but they refused to come. The gang broke Rob’s nose and badly beat his boyfriend too. (The Independent, 11th October 2007)

Batty-boy? That’s Jamaican slang for bum-bandit! Surely Hari isn’t letting slip that one oppressed minority, namely blacks, can turn on another oppressed minority, namely homosexuals? Well, yes, he is. The “lads” may not have been black, but either way they were influenced by black “homophobia”, which, like Muslim homophobia, is much more vicious and violent than anything the white British dish out. Jamaica, Pakistan and Bangladesh are far more homophobic than Britain. They’re also far more misogynist and rape-inclined. By allowing mass immigration from these countries, the self-proclaimed defenders of gay and women’s rights are ensuring more and worse violence against gays and women. There’s a blatant contradiction, isn’t there?

Well, no, in fact there isn’t. New Labour have no real concern for their shock-troops and will happily see them suffer in pursuit of what does matter: power for themselves. Laws against hate speech are not meant to benefit the alleged victims but to give the state another whip to lash down dissent. The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats want to get their hands on the whip too. Have they promised to repeal the new hate laws if they win power? Nope. And note that our traitorous politicians have no objection to hate when it’s directed against whites or men, because those are the groups that threaten their revolution. In fact, there is a huge state apparatus working to promote hate against those groups. The point is that everyone must think what the state decrees. Kolakowski again:

Marcuse’s system depends on replacing the tyranny of logic by a police tyranny. This is corroborated by all historical experience: there is only one way of making a whole society accept a particular world-view and the Marcusian union of Eros and Logos can only be realized in the form of a totalitarian state, established and governed by force; the freedom he advocates is non-freedom. If “true” freedom does not mean freedom of choice but consists in choosing a particular object; if freedom of speech does not mean that people can say what they like, but that they must say the right thing; and if Marcuse and his followers have the sole right to decide what people must choose and what people must say, then “freedom” has simply taken on the contrary of its normal sense. In these terms a “free” society is one that deprives people of freedom to choose either objects or ideas except at the behest of those who know better. (Op. cit., pg. 418-9)

Those who know better. Isn’t that the self-definition of NuLabour in the UK and the neo-cons in the US? Of liberals in general? We know better and you will obey. You will say, do and think what we tell you. The homo hate laws say: “Love Big Bugger!” Behind Big Bugger is Big Brother. Big Sister too. But behind all of them is Big Jew. In Treasure Island, Long John Silver hid treachery and gold-lust behind a smiling face; in the modern West, Long John Sheeney hides treachery and power-lust behind compassion and concern for oppressed minorities. As he pretends to help them, he’s really working to help himself. First take away free speech about race, then about religion, then about homosexuality, because as free speech dies something else is born. Vive la révolution!
Story Here


I'm just reading her history now, and I'm hooked! A true nationalist, she married her country and people. Maybe that's an innocent way of looking at history right now, but I admire it.

Watch the Rest of the Movie Here

Sunday, October 28, 2007

Get That jew a Doctor... A Lawyer... Somebody!

H to the istronic, or what?